×

Best Commentaries on Luke

Luke the physician writes this Gospel account to his protégé Theophilus. Likely written to edify Gentile Christians, Luke shows how God’s redemptive promises to rescue Jews and Gentiles are fulfilled through the work of the obedient divine Son. Luke carefully traces how Christ is the fulfillment of the Hebrew Scriptures, and from his birth accounts, he shows readers the counterintuitive nature of Christ’s upside-down kingdom.

Luke’s telling of Christ’s ministry journey from Galilee to Jerusalem brims with stories of healing and restoration for the poor and forgotten. Again and again, Luke declares that the Lord has come with authority to deliver his people from sin, captivity, and exile. He points to the kingdom’s future reality as well—Christ’s reign over all things and Satan’s ultimate defeat.

Here are our picks for the best commentaries on Luke.

Introductory Commentaries

For Sunday school teachers and small group leaders without advanced training

Preaching Commentaries

For pastors and Bible teachers preparing to proclaim the Word

Scholarly Commentaries

For pastors and theologians proficient in biblical Greek

Luke

Darrell L. Bock
Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament
Baker Academic, 1996

Carson says Bock’s comprehensive treatment of Luke’s Gospel is “well-written and intelligent.” Bock gives a careful exposition of the Greek in its historical context, and he engages with all the scholarly questions about Luke’s historicity and sources. This set is the standard for serious students with knowledge of the original language.

The Gospel of Luke

Joel B. Green
New International Commentary on the New Testament
Eerdmans, 1997

Green’s commentary of nearly a thousand pages helps readers see broader literary connections, themes, and cultural background material. The commentary is thought-provoking and filled with thoughtful interaction with contemporary scholarship. Carson says its “forte” is “narrative historiography and discourse analysis,” but notes one downside of Green’s almost exclusively literary reading; this means Green downplays discussion about the relation between Luke and the other Synoptics, including the major historical issues implicit in such discussions.